【直报网12月22日讯】（评论员 肖潇）雅芳行贿的事2008年就曝了光，最近雅芳与美国证交会达成和解，承认其违反美国的《反海外贿赂法》，同意支付1.35亿美元。在中国发生的事，雅芳只受到美国的处罚，这不禁令人浮想联翩：雅芳行贿在中国为啥没事？中国政府对于雅芳也应展开调查，做出处罚，甚至应该吊销其通过行贿取得的直销牌照。

CNDSN December 22nd news commentator Xiao Xiao Avon bribery thing 2008 exposed to the light, and America recently Avon sec settlement, admitting that the violation of the USA "anti bribery law", agreed to pay $135000000. In Chinese happened, Avon only by American punishment, could not help but Thoughts thronged one's mind.: Avon bribery have nothing in the Chinese why? Should also be for Avon investigation, make the punishment Chinese government, even should revoke its direct selling license obtained through bribery.

《直销管理条例》实施的当年，雅芳就在中国第一个获得了直销经营许可证。道理很简单，雅芳第一个获得直销牌照的真正原因是他们向中国官员行了贿。2008年商务部“郭京毅窝案”查处，原商务部外资司副司长邓湛应声落马。因为邓湛曾力主建立“有中国特色的直销体系”，亲自操作向雅芳等外资公司发放了直销牌照。所以，当年雅芳是向邓湛等官员行贿是一个不可否认的事实。然而，据2010年邓湛的判决书以及相关报道，邓湛的受贿罪行有三项：一是接受北京思峰律师事务所律师张玉栋贿赂179.5万元，二是接受飞利浦公司副总裁季铁安的贿赂40万，三是接受新澳公司的贿赂。其中，并没有涉及雅芳的行贿。这到底说明了什么？笔者观察，这可能中国司法机关受到了包括美国有关方面的外来压力，故意把雅芳向邓湛等官员的行贿行为“放了水”，以确保雅芳在中国的正常经营。

"The implementation of direct selling regulations" of the year, Avon in Chinese won the first direct selling license. The reason is very simple, Avon the first direct selling license the real reason was that they did China bribes to officials. In 2008 the Ministry of Commerce "Guo Jingyi nest case" investigation, the original foreign ministry deputy director Deng Zhan answered Lok ma. Because of Deng Zhan has strongly advocated the establishment of "direct selling system" has Chinese characteristics, operate personally issued direct selling licenses to the Foreign capital company Avon etc.. So, when Avon to Deng Zhan and other officials of bribery is an undeniable fact. However, according to 2010 Deng Zhan judgment and the related report, Deng Zhan bribery crime has three: one is to accept the Beijing seafront law firm lawyers Zhang Yudong bribery 1795000 yuan, two is to accept Philips company vice president Ji Tiean bribery 400000, three new Australian company is accepting bribes. Among them, and there is no bribery involving the Avon. What explains this? This observation, which may be the Chinese judicial organs such as pressure from outside the United States concerned, deliberately AVON Xiang Deng Zhan and other official bribery "put water", in order to ensure the normal operation of AVON in china.

但是，美国是一个法治国家，不会对雅芳行贿进行“放水”的。2008年，雅芳的中国员工向总部举报其在中国有“不正当支付”行为，引发了美国雅芳的内部调查和美国证交会的外部调查。但在中国，对雅芳行贿事件司法机关却没有一点动静，怪不得有媒体质问：虽然“雅芳贿赂门”已经曝光6年，但我们至今也不知道雅芳到底贿赂了哪些中国官员，更不要说受贿者被追究刑事责任了。比如直销专业网如是问道：雅芳已经乖乖认罚的“通过行贿获得中国直销牌照”的事，雅芳是向哪些中国官员行贿的？那些Gucci包包，现在谁在用？雅芳花钱行贿，抹平自家“负面报道”是否属实？对于这些疑点，中国的司法机关当顺藤摸瓜，查个水落石出。美国司法机关通过《反海外贿赂法》管到了中国地盘上的受贿，中国司法机关为何没有作为？

However, the United States is a nation of laws, not bribery "release" of AVON. In 2008, AVON China headquarters staff to report the "unfair" payment behavior in China, raised outside investigation and internal investigation of American AVON sec. But in China, but no movement on the AVON bribery judicial organs, no wonder the media question: Although the "AVON bribery" has been exposed for 6 years, but we still do not know exactly what AVON bribed Chinese officials, don't even say bribery was investigated for criminal responsibility. For example, direct marketing professional is asked: AVON has obediently penalty "through bribery to obtain China direct selling license", AVON is offering bribes to which Chinese officials? The Gucci bag, who by now? AVON pay, smooth out their "negative news" is true? For these questions, Chinese judicial organs as Shuntengmogua, go check it out. American judiciary through the "anti bribery law" tube to China on bribery, why Chinese judicial organs have no?

雅芳行贿在中国没事，中国司法机关应该对社会有个交待。殊不知，雅芳虽然赔出了1.35亿美元的天价，但都是美国的刑事罚金和民事和解赔偿，跟中国没有任何关系。直销专业网如下的分析很有道理：雅芳行贿的是中国官员，用不正当途径取得的是中国的直销牌照，破坏的是中国市场竞争公平性，损害的是中国企业、消费者的利益，但绕一大圈子，中国人没有得到一点补偿？笔者认同直销专业网提出的要求：中国政府对于雅芳也应展开调查，做出处罚，甚至应该吊销其通过行贿取得的直销牌照。

AVON bribery in China right, Chinese judicial organs should have confessed to the society. However, although AVON paid out $135000000 price, but are American criminal penalties and civil reconciliation compensation, without any relationship with china. Analysis of direct marketing professional follows a very reasonable: AVON bribery is the Chinese officials, made by improper way is a direct selling license in China, the damage is the China market competition fairness, the damage is the Chinese enterprises and the interests of consumers, but around a big circle, the Chinese people did not get a little compensation? The author agree with direct marketing professional demands: should also be for AVON to launch an investigation, the Chinese government should make the punishment, or even revoke its direct selling license obtained through bribery.

有一点可以肯定的：雅芳行贿在中国没事，说明我国司法机关也有姑息此事的责任。党的十八届三中全会已指明了以法治国的方向。对雅芳行贿一事，我们不能只看到美国方面的严厉查处，更要看到中国方面的严厉查处，因为雅芳行贿不是发生在美国，而是发生在中国。对此，大家正拭目观之！▲

There is certainly a point: the AVON bribery in China is all right, the description of China's judicial organs have palliative responsibility. Eighteen party 3 in plenary meeting has pointed out the direction of the rule of law. On the Avon bribery thing, we can not only see the severe and America aspect, to see more severely punished Chinese aspect, because Avon bribery does not occur in the American, but occurred in China. In this regard, we are to wait and see the view! *

责任编辑：小申

Editor: small Shen