2016-06-16 15:40
Congestion fees would like to get people to understand the road I'm afraid it is very long
[straight news network Beijing June 16 hearing] (Xinhua) after the media repeatedly pressed the parking fees chaos unanswered, Beijing to ease urban congestion but also charge a congestion charge. Recently, Beijing Municipal Committee of the CPPCC held the haze governance proposals for consultation on the news, the Beijing Municipal Traffic Committee shall, jointly with the municipal development and Reform Commission, the Environmental Protection Bureau, Public Security Traffic Management Bureau and other departments, has been initially developed the Beijing traffic congestion charging policy options and technical scheme, currently group fabric further in-depth research and demonstration.
Congestion charge refers to the economic means to charge a certain fee for road users in some area during the traffic jam session. The truth sounds awkward writing is actually very simple: which block which charges when plugging when charging.
On the one hand, this money is the use of economic levers leveraging motorists to avoid the hot sections, or to switch to public transportation method. On the other hand, the conventional understanding, use of congestion fee will also use to ease traffic congestion. But in Beijing City, a lot of so-called "conventional plugging point" is actually the only way in daily traffic". And these "only way" is really just because of the congestion caused by the car?
With Beijing North Sanhuan Suzhouqiao from north to south of the road, for example, almost every day will block the blocking point and the road from north to south in just 900 meters in length, from the original 3 Lane differentiation to overpass bridge sections 1 Lane, with driver as saying, "do not block is odd". In Beijing, such as the planning is not reasonable and very difficult to modify the section of the road can be found everywhere.
Guide the vehicle to avoid blocking point, also need to allow vehicles to have options, the money in no way optional congestion charge and highway have why to distinguish from the urban planning is not reasonable lead to congestion point of view, the congestion charge and can be understood as put taxpayers on the hook for the worst of the urban public service pay. And this inadvisable plan caused by congestion, also prove that the we cannot be of low efficiency of urban operation "sin", simply boils down to "car" up.
In addition, another purpose of congestion charges is to reduce the intensity of the use of motor vehicles, driving people to use public transport. But combined with the actual situation of public transport in Beijing, the subway, buses and other public transport in the peak of the congestion level has become the work of the suffering of the journey. Continue to increase the congestion intensity, passengers under extreme or vehicle scheduling ability can reach the need for scientific explanation? And the reason. In fact, we all know, is workplace highly clustered in the inner city, lead to internal and external tide of traffic of city of day after day, root knot defects of urban planning does not solve. Now, once the congestion charge, will guide the use of public transport vehicles to use public transport, when the number of public resources suddenly increased, the original user will feel the loss of their public interest.
More crowded, more crowded, more crowded, squeezing the root does not go up...... They move sheire who? The truth with odd and even numbers limit line of the joint effect of basically the same -- in order to smooth roads at the expense of did not buy cars and crowds of interests.
The only reason for the public to give a "understanding" of this charge is to achieve effective mitigation of congestion, thereby improving the overall efficiency of urban operations. But from the current point of view, authorities did not give a clear clear data, accept the congestion charge can reduce the number of vehicles travel? To reduce how many cars can obviously relieve congestion. Improve the efficiency benefits can exceed the congestion charge increased travel costs?
In short, the congestion charge levied is still in public opinion does not support, logic is not fluent, the goal is not clear "3 not" situation.
No matter how to locate the congestion fee "this move is always the temporary method. Traffic jams are common in every large cities over the world, the growth in the number of cars not only from the intuitive witnessed the China's economic take-off, proving that wound up in urban planning could not keep up with the rapid traffic demand. Urban planning in the emergence and the expected deviation, should be as soon as possible to ease and rectify.
Congestion fees if the real levy, the public will not only need to see where the money, but also to see the decision behind the corrective action for the urban planning also made a permanent cure. "Historical legacy" is to correct the difficulties, and should not be to avoid the radical means only in the line, the charges on the election to choose an excuse". 3
(original title: congestion would like to get people to understand the road probably still long)
Editor: Xiao Shen
Read news hot spots, showing sensitive events, more exclusive analysis, as in the "things" WeChat, scan two-dimensional code free reading.
|